Thursday, May 21, 2009

winter is here...

Nothing too exciting on the training front in the last week - which is not a bad thing! Although I have been officially sacked as weather reporter/predictor. For two Sundays I have said "no long ride on the road - rain is coming". And twice it has been fine. There was rain, but it did not really arrive during the ride time! Of course if I had gone out, it would have poured down! I have been caught a couple of times in the rain - and it is very wet rain at the moment!

Winter temperatures have certainly arrived. Going to training in the early mornings is certainly cold now, with 4 degrees the lowest so far. Even had to bring the thermal gloves out for a run! I am OK with the cold - I just don't like the wet and cold! In fact I think I just don't like the wet. Minor aches and pains of training appear to become more than minor with the cold too - which I am not liking!
I have sort of missed a couple of sessions in the last week or so - mainly rides. A couple of school rides ended up being wind trainer sessions instead of road rides - so I get to yell instructions for an hour or so instead of sitting at the back of a bunch riding... It can be a tough life being a coach. Work got in the way of a couple of days as well - giving talks and going to events. Nothing too stressful at all, just time consuming and I get quite tired with lots of standing.
A few weeks ago James (swim coach) asked for a few harder swim sessions from us. I put forward one that was pretty solid, with some trepidation, as I figured it was probably going to pop up in the near future. The guts of the session was that you started at 50m on 1:30 (plenty of rest), and then you add 50m to each subsequent rep and 30 seconds to the send off, and keep doing that until you can't make the send-off time. So you basically have to start swimming quite fast to make the send-off times at some point! The time I got given this session (many years ago), there was then 8x100 fly after you didn't make the send-off time! I was first to start the fly back then! Friday rolls around and I start to receive these abusive text messages! It does not take too much to work out that my little gem of a session popped up on Friday (I was not there - I was doing run intervals). I arrive to swimming on Monday morning and I get greeted with "You Fcuk*#@ pri##! And you didn't even turn up for your own session" and a couple of other less friendly comments! There was no love in the lane - I can assure you of that! Dean Kent (Olympic swimmer) shows up on Wednesday - and we get introduced, and I get "Oh - you are the guy that made that session up on Friday!". It obviously affected people quite severely! James did alter the session slightly - from what I can gather - He started at 100 on 2:15 and I think they all finished on 500m which would have been on 6:15 - which is a solid pace (you have to average better than 1:15 per 100m). But they didn't have to do the fly! They all appear to be over it now...
I have been meaning to write a bit sort of loosely based on the swim squad experience - more along the lines of "Raising the standard". I have been swimming at the Glenfield squad for a few years - off and on, and it ha certainly been through a few changes. But most of the changes have been the people that have passed through. James (the coach) is pretty old school, and his swim programs are pretty standard. If you go on a certain day, you know pretty much what you are going to get. That is a good thing for me - it makes putting the sessions into a plan much easier. The current group in the faster lanes are mostly older athletes that "have been something" is their sporting pasts - at least NZ reps, and a few Olympians in there too. Everyone pretty much gets on, and the sessions get done in some shape or form. Negotiations are often enacted without much coach decision involved, and it all works very well. What has generally happened is that the standards have gone up and become the new expectations - and there is not really any complaints, it is just accepted that "this is the new standard". For example, Wednesday usually has a 1500m swim in it - not a time trial, just a swim. Sometimes people give it a good go, and it is usually a solid pace. I usually swim just under 20 minutes (pull) and get lapped between 2 and 4 times! Last week I was a bit over the idea of doing a 1500m - so I suggested 15x100 instead. Pretty much everyone was happy with that. A few years ago, that would have been 15 on 1:30 (send-off time), perhaps the last 5 on 1:25. But the lane leaders (not me!) quickly decide it is 5 on 1:25, 5 on 1:20 and 5 on 1:15 - and I just quietly gulp at the back of the lane, knowing the last 4-500m will be continuous! We did the same again this week. Many other squad I have swum in, with this sort of set there would be plenty of complaints - it is solid, and a challenge to get through! But there are no complaints (I don't think I said mine out loud anyway...) - and at the end, someone comments in an excited voice, "we should try going on 1:10 next month!!".

That is crazy!!! I have seen numerous times where good athletes have really worked together in training in a very positive manner to help each other become far greater athletes. I also had a similar experience cycling in Dunedin when I lived there. In many cases it is training with one of your greatest competitors - and helping them to become better - possibly to your own detriment at the next race. But if you are looking at the bigger picture and see that on the big stage you have to be far better, then that is certainly a risk worth taking. If you are only interested in being the big fish in your local (and usually quite small) pond - then perhaps it is not worthwhile. I have also witnessed training situations where athletes are competitive in training in a very destructive manner. Rather than try to help each other get better, they try to crush each other and break each other. The end result is very poor results on race day and the only results that count are the first 4 x 100m reps at swim squad on Wednesday (even if the set is 12x100). Not really helping improve the standards at all.

No comments: